I think it's time we all switched to using gold as our unit of account, as the fiat currencies of the world continue to be consumed in a firestorm of inflationary "money" creation. Whether or not we hold actual physical gold (which we should, as our bedrock cash position) we should be seeking to own stuff that is rising in value in gold terms. The real problem is that the signals we get from investments priced in EUR, USD, JPY, etc. are being seriously distorted by the massive issuance of these currencies, resulting in investors continuing to hold them and even add to them, believing their value is rising when it is in fact falling.

US government bonds are a prime example – widely considered the safest investment in the world, and rising fairly steadily for years as interest rates drifted lower, they have in fact fallen to about half their 2002 value. Here are the details, using TLT, the 20 year T-Bond ETF as an example… In July of 2002, when the ETF was launched, you would have paid $82 per share for it. Over the years, you would have collected $29.71 in interest, and today you could sell each share for about $90. A nice, safe 46% return over 7.75 years, or 5% CAGR. But measured in gold grams, the picture is radically different. Each share cost 8.4 grams in 2002, and paid a total of 1.8 grams in interest over the years. Today, you could sell each share for about 2.5 grams – a 49% loss over the same 8 year period, for a -8.4% CAGR. I have created a chart of TLT in USD and gold, based on the "adjusted closing price" as calculated by Yahoo finance. Take a look at it to see what I'm talking about.
US Treasury Bonds in USD and Gold
And this is just the start of the collapse… as more dollars are created, bond buyers will begin to worry about the value of the dollars that will eventually be returned to them, and the interest they demand will skyrocket. This will create a double-whammy drop in bond prices as their value in dollars falls, and the value of each dollar falls as well.

Of course, just holding gold doesn't earn any profit (as measured in gold) but it doesn't lose value, either. There are plenty of investment strategies that have risen in gold value over that same period, but buying and holding most stock indices, bonds, real estate are not among them.

I'm working on a DVD series called "The Truth About Gold" that will detail some strategies for dramatically expanding your wealth, as measured in gold. I will be making a few copies available to early adopters on a pre-order basis; if you are interested, drop me an email at truth@pricedingold.com

I've recorded an expanded commentary on this topic as a podcast. You can download it or listen to it here:

Audio MP3

1

The news media is full of articles touting the Dow Jones Industrial Average close above 11,000 today. The chart below shows the index price in USD from 2006 to April of 2010.

In summary, prices had been rising since 2003, and began 2006 around the 11,000 level. They continued a relatively steady march to a new all-time high around 14,000 in the fall of 2007. The credit implosion of 2008 rapidly forced the index to a low around 6,500 in March of 2009, but since then it has been recovering strongly, returning to the 11,000 level today.

DJIA in USD from 1997-2010

This is the conventional story… but what is the truth?

The problem is that the Dow Index is measured in US Dollars, a highly volatile currency. As a result of the credit crisis, there has been tremendous creation of new money by the Federal Reserve to keep the monetary system afloat, causing a drastic reduction in value of the USD. In spite of this, there have been moments when the urgent need for US Dollars, to pay off debts and de-leverage, has forced the dollar's value higher, in a kind of "short squeeze", and occasionally problems in other countries have become so severe that the USD was seen as safe by comparison, increasing demand for it, and temporarily boosting it's value. (As Doug Casey recently observed, the US Dollar may be toilet paper, but at least it's three-ply!)

So when we remove the roller-coaster value of the USD from the picture, by pricing the Dow Jones Industrial Average in gold, what do we see?

DJIA 2006-2010 in Gold grams

From 2006 to fall of 2007, instead of rising 27% from 11,000 to 14,000 the index actually went sideways, hovering around 600 gold grams. Instead of falling 53%, from 14,000 to about 6,500, it actually fell 63%, from 600 grams to 220 grams. From this low it quickly rebounded to the 300 gram level, where it has been for the last year.

Although it's dollar value has returned to the level seen in 2006 and mid-2008, it's true value, measured in gold, is half of it's 2006 level, and three-quarters of it's 2008 level. Stock prices have not risen at all for the last year. The US Dollar, and most other fiat currencies, have simply fallen in value due to central bank manipulations, creating the appearance – but not the substance – of recovery and growth.

So don't be fooled… Keep an eye on what your investments are really doing, by pricing them in gold!

Here are my comments on the US home price data just released in April of 2010. Prices in dollars appear to be stabilizing… but what is really happening?

Filed under monetary universe by  #

Here is a news item I found interesting, followed by my restatement of the story, priced in gold. You can also view a chart of net worth.

Americans' net worth rises for third straight quarter

Friday, March 12, 2010

Stock gains boost Americans' net worth

Americans regained more of their shrunken wealth last quarter, mainly because of gains in stock portfolios. The Federal Reserve reported Thursday that household net worth rose 1.3 percent in the fourth quarter of 2009, to $54.2 trillion. Net worth rose 4.5 percent in the second quarter and 5.5 percent in the third. The value of stocks rose nearly 4 percent in the period, to $7.7 trillion. Higher home prices helped a bit: Real estate holdings edged up 0.2 percent.

Americans' net worth would have to rise 21 percent more to get back to its pre-recession peak of $65.9 trillion.

— Associated Press

===========================

Here's the story as priced in gold:

Americans' net worth falls for second quarter in a row

Friday, March 12, 2010

Currency losses gut Americans' net worth

Americans saw their wealth shrink again last quarter, mainly because of losses in the value of the dollar. The Federal Reserve reported Thursday that household net worth fell 8.7 percent in the fourth quarter of 2009, to 1,526 tonnes of gold. Net worth had risen 2.5 percent in the second quarter and fallen 1 percent in the third. Aside from the second quarter's uptick, net worth has been falling every period since the third quarter of 2007. Falling home prices caused a major hit: Real estate holdings dropped 9.6 percent to 467 tonnes. The value of stocks fell 6.3 percent in the period, to 217 tonnes of gold. Underlying all of these drops is the continuing debasement of the US Dollar, as bogus "bailouts", "stimulus plans" and other reckless deficit spending take their toll.

Americans' net worth would have to rise 227 percent to get back to its pre-recession peak of 5,000 tonnes of gold.

— Associated Press and PricedinGold.com

8

In a recent comment, Jules wrote "I once heard that a semester of college in 1920 cost the same number of gold oz as it would in 1990. Any truth to that?"

I've been wondering about that for some time now. My kids are young enough that I still have about 10 years before they will be looking at colleges, but it raises an interesting question: how much gold do I need to save now to cover their college costs in ten years?

After looking around for tuition numbers, I decided to focus on Yale University. They publish A Yale Book of Numbers and an update that contain all sorts of interesting data about Yale (including tuition costs) from 1701 to 1999. More recent data is available in news reports, press releases, and from Sallie Mae. I've compiled some of this data into the chart of Yale College Tuition, and I will update it annually going forward.

Although dollar costs for tuition, room, and board have risen tremendously, from about $700 per year in 1900 to $48,622 per year in 2009, their price in gold has only risen from 1,053 gold grams in 1900 to 1,726 gold grams in 2009. It's been a wild ride, though!

Before we continue, re-read that last paragraph carefully… in dollars, prices have risen to 70 times their starting price! SEVENTY TIMES! In gold, they are up 64% over a 109 year period. Interestingly, Yale tuition was almost exactly the same in the 2008-2009 school year (1,633 grams) as it was in the 1932-1933 school year (1,589 grams). It works out that 2008's annual tuition is just $30 more in the gold coins of 1932. In fact you'd get a couple of silver quarters and a silver dime back in change from your $10 eagle and $20 double eagle. This is in spite of a 44x increase in dollar prices, from $1,056 in 1932 to $46,000 in 2008.

Prices were quite stable until World War I, when they began to rise, peaking in the early 1930s at around 1,600 grams – not far from today's price! Although tuition prices in dollars were stable or rising very slowly, the collapse of the dollar in 1934, from about 1.5 grams to .88 grams, lowered tuitions as measured in gold dramatically.

They stayed low until after World War II, when they began to rise strongly, from about 1,000 grams to a peak of 3,441 grams in 1970. When Nixon gave up the defense of the dollar and closed the gold window, the dollar again collapsed, and although tuitions doubled in dollar terms, they fell in gold terms to a low of about 450 grams in 1980. As the dollar doubled in value from 1980 to 1999, and tuitions continued to rise in dollar terms as well, tuitions priced in gold rocketed to a new all-time high of 3,929 grams in 1999.

Since then, despite rising about 50% in dollar terms, the plunging value of the dollar has cut the cost of tuition to less than half of its old high.

As for the future? I don't own a crystal ball, so I can't be very specific… Still, it looks to me as though the current economic troubles could pull tuitions (priced in gold) lower from here. Technically, there seems to be good support at about 1,000 grams, and 500 would be a real bargain. It may take a few years to reach those levels, though. And 5 years after that, when I'm looking at college expenses for my kids? I suspect that the same 1.5 kg of gold that would cover most of a year today will still do the job then, even if the US Government is printing $1,000,000 bills and it takes a wad of them to buy a Big Mac.

Filed under Economy, gold prices by  #

I'm off to Vancouver BC for Agora's annual investment conference. This year, I will only be able to take in two days, July 22nd and 23rd. If you are attending, look for my trademark pith helmet! I'd love to talk with you about gold, the economy and how life is shaping up for you. Please look me up if you get a chance! You can also follow me on Twitter, @vollumc.

Filed under monetary universe by  #

Since I published Gold101 there have been some wonderful articles giving additional details on buying and storing physical gold.

The first, called "Gold coin shortage likely to become chronic" by Michael J. Kosares, outlines the reasons why gold bullion coins have been so hard to find at reasonable premiums, and why these forces will probably keep premiums high in the future as well. BTW, Michael's book, The ABCs of Gold Investing: How to Protect and Build Your Wealth With Gold is well worth reading if you are new to buying gold.

The second article was written by the editors of BIG GOLD at Casey Research and published in Dr. Steve Sjuggerud's excellent (and free) Daily Wealth email. Its title, "What You Need to Know About Storing Physical Gold" says it all.

Take advantage of gold's recent pullback (aka the US Dollar's recent strength) to add to your stock of cash that clanks – and keep your investments growing in their gold value!

Charles

PS: Dan Ferris, editor of Extreme Value, a newsletter I recommended to you in Gold101, scored big points with me in his weekly update today. Dan is a dyed-in-the-wool value investor, and his portfolio contains only excellent companies that are trading at great prices. But today he told his subscribers to sell several of his portfolio picks – including some long-time favorites and some very recent recommendations. Why did he do this? Because his honest opinion is that the stock market has further to fall, and having cash on hand will be key to taking advantage of the values that will be available in the future. He is keeping the strongest of his stocks, especially those he calls "World Dominators", and is buying some outstanding gold-related companies. This had to be a hard letter for him to write, but I think he's doing the right thing, and I applaud him for it. Follow his lead: take a hard look at what's in your portfolio, and don't be afraid to sell the weakest things in it, whether at a loss or a profit. Concentrate on strength and building your cash position for buying when things turn around.

1

Here are a few resources to help you move some of your savings into gold.

Remember that gold is a form of cash, not an investment. It doesn't grow in value, create new jobs, earn profits, or generate income for you. It is simply a currency that no government can counterfeit or debase. You should hold it as a way to reduce the volatility of your portfolio, or for long term saving. Don't imagine that owning gold will make you rich: If gold doubles in price due to massive creation of fiat currency, most of the other things you need to buy will eventually double in price as well. Gold can preserve your wealth, but not really grow it. For that you need real investments and prudent speculations.

Gold is the King of Cash!

From safest to riskiest:

1) Physical bullion coins and bars – your main risk is physical security. You need a safe place to keep it where it won't be stolen. Bank safe deposit boxes are great – unless the bank is closed. In-home safes and backyard burial are some of the alternatives. Pros: no counter-party risk, it's in your own control. Cons: hard to find at decent a price these days. Track the spot price at Kitco's 24 hr Live Gold. My favorite way to buy is through my local coin dealer, Beaverton Coin and Stamp. I suggest you look in the yellow pages and make the acquaintance of your local coin shop; they can be very helpful, and may be the best place to sell your gold when the time comes to convert your savings in to local currency. Another dealer I have used for years, always with very good results is Camino Coins.

2) Goldmoney.com – stores your gold (and silver) in insured third-party vaults in London or Zurich, and allow you to buy and sell via wire transfer, very quickly and easily. This is a great service, very easy to set up and use, perfect for savings. Pros: Very low markup, low storage fees, very safe storage, online access to funds. Cons: no way to get the gold in your hands except to sell the Goldmoney and use the funds to purchase physical gold. It is one of the best forms of "paper gold", but not quite the same as real gold in your pocket.

3) The Gold ETF, symbol "GLD": This is a stock that you can buy and sell in your brokerage account. The fund's managers try to make the value of each share be the same as 1/10 ounce of gold. There are also options on it , as with many stocks. Pros: a great tool for trading and speculating. Quick and easy to buy and sell. Cons: it is a stock, not really gold itself. Brokerages, dealers, stock exchanges, and many other counter-parties all have to perform in order for you to realize value from this security. Best used for shorter term trades in times when the markets are functioning well.

The next two categories are really speculations, not cash positions. Used prudently, they can increase the gold value of your investments. Used carelessly, they can destroy your savings. Proceed with caution:

4) Numismatic gold coins – these are really collectible antiques, with gold playing only a minor role in their value. They can be a great speculation, but like gold stocks they can rise and fall much faster than gold itself. There are some that are available for close to bullion prices; these are attractive because they offer a numismatic "kicker" to the gold value. Circulated common date US gold coins were in this category until recently; now they are hard to find at reasonable prices. On the other hand, almost all rare gold coins are now trading at premiums to gold that are very low compared to historical averages, and many offer good values; but they are still mostly "premium" and only a little "gold". Do not buy numismatics unless you know what you are doing or have expert assistance. My favorite expert is Van Simmons, president of David Hall Rare Coins.

5) Gold stocks: These are companies that explore for and mine gold and other metals, finance gold mining and receive royalties from gold production. Very risky! Many are just "holes in the ground surrounded by liars". Some are excellent speculations that can rise much faster than gold itself (and fall faster, as well). Some generate very nice income streams. You need good research to find the best plays and avoid the deathtraps. The dean of resource investing is Rick Rule of Global Resource Investments. Highly recommended. Newsletters that have performed well for me in the past (for many investments, not just gold stocks) include Brent Cook's Exploration Insights, Agora Financial's Options Hotline, Stansberry and Associates' Extreme Value, True Wealth and Short Report letters. Doug Casey has several excellent newsletters including Big Gold.

I hope this is helpful!

Charles

Filed under wages and salaries by  #

Although nobody wants to use the "N" word, more and more economists, including Nobel Prize winners, are saying that this is really our only choice. Of course it will only be "temporary". Maybe it will be "partial". But any way you slice it, it will be ugly. Thanks to a tip from Seeker Blog editor Steve Darden, I recently came across a great opinion piece in the Financial Times called "To Save the Banks We Must Stand Up to the Bankers". In this article, Peter Boone, a researcher at the London School of Economics and Simon Johnson, former IMF chief economist, and professor at the MIT Sloan School of Management, give us the following memorable quote:

"If you want to end up with the economy of Pakistan, the politics of Ukraine and the inflation rate of Zimbabwe, bank nationalisation is the way to go."

They suggest some ways to avoid a few of the potholes in the bank recovery roadmap, but ultimately it comes down to having the political will to do the hard things, to deliver sufficient pain to the banking and financial elite that created the mess in the first place with the willing collusion and encouragement of government. Pain that must be confronted to cleanse the system of toxic waste and moral hazard. What is the chance of this type of solution coming out of a bipartisan working group? And if it was offered, what are the chances of it being implemented? And if tried, how long would it last before being abandoned as "un-workable"?

It is so much easier to just put the patient on an IV drip of stimulants and pain killers… which the Fed is happy to provide in many forms, most powerfully by "quantitative easing" and "expanding it's balance sheet", also known as "printing money".

Of course, most of the "experts" say that once the crisis has passed, and things are "back to normal" (whatever the heck that means) the Fed can simply "drain excess liquidity out of the system" to avoid any serious inflation. This is roughly the equivalent of taking the patient, now living in a happy pain-free daze, out of the heart-lung machine, pulling the IV drip, and sending him home to go cold turkey. And handing him a huge bill – equal to a large fraction of his annual income – as he checks out of the hospital.

You get the picture.

What is the solution? Have some money that has no counterparty risk and cannot be counterfeited, even by governments. Of course that means gold, preferably physical gold in your personal possession. How much? That's up to you; but with gold paying about the same interest as treasury bills, with much lower risk, and with the multitude of economic problems still lurking out there, I think 10 to 20 percent of your liquid assets would be a good place to start, and going over half would not be at all imprudent. At the moment, Cash is King, and gold is the King of cash.

Don't get swept up in illusory losses and gains due to the volatile pricing of fiat currencies like the US Dollar, either. Track your investments and net worth in gold, and don't be afraid to cut the under-performers from your portfolio. However ugly things look now, you want to be worth more gold next year than you are worth today.

Let me know if there's any way Priced in Gold can help.

Filed under Banking, Economy, new highs, nz dollars by  #

Gold is a type of money, just like Dollars, Euros, Pounds and Yen. Unlike these other forms of money, gold has been around for thousands of years, while many fiat systems have come and gone. Because the amount of gold in the world cannot be increased without finding and mining more of it, its value is fairly constant. This is in stark contrast to the fiat monies which can be created on command by governments and central banks.

When someone talks about the price of gold in some currency like US Dollars, they are talking about the exchange rate between two currencies – gold and dollars. It makes just as much sense to talk about the price of the dollar in gold as it does to talk about the price of gold in dollars. It all depends on which currency is central to your thinking. For most of my life, I've lived in the United States, and used US Dollars to purchase groceries, keep my accounts, and so on. But when I lived in England, I used Pounds to buy my groceries, and keep my accounts. When building a boat in New Zealand, I had accounts in NZ Dollars, paid for the boat's construction in NZ Dollars and paid bills and expenses in NZ Dollars while visiting there. Same for my visits to Japan, Germany, Mexico, Tahiti, and so on. Still, as I traveled, I always related the value of the local currency back to my "home currency", the US Dollar. "How much is that in dollars?", I would ask myself. When I had the answer, I could assess the price and decide "Wow, cheese is a real bargain!" or "Sheesh! Gasoline is really expensive here!".

But to think of the US Dollar as "the center of the monetary universe" with all other currencies circling around it is silly. When friends of mine from England visit the US, they are doing just the opposite of what I did when visiting them – they are relating all the US Dollar prices they see back to their "home currency", the Pound Sterling.

I have now come to realize that we are all travelers… moving through space around the globe and through time as well. As we move to new places and new times we find people using new forms of local money. Sometimes these moneys have the same name, but very different values. Dollars in the US or New Zealand or Hong Kong or Australia or Zimbabwe do not have the same value as one another. And one US Dollar in 2008 does not have the same value that one US Dollar had in 2003.

Gold is a money that is recognized around the world, throughout all of history, and changes value very gradually over time. To my mind, this makes it the perfect money in which to value all the others. The perfect "home currency" to relate local prices back to, to determine whether things are cheap or dear.

In today's world of "floating exchange rates", the market sets the price of one currency in terms of another. Traders buying Japanese Yen with US Dollars, selling New Zealand Dollars for British Pounds, buying Swiss Francs with Euros, and so on, agree on how much they will pay for each transaction made. These transactions are posted electronically and become the bid and ask prices that guide other buyers and sellers, and are called the "spot prices" of currencies. Traders are also buying and selling currencies for delivery in the future, months or even years from now. The prices they set are based on the spot price, but also figure in estimates of future changes in value due to inflation, interest rates, expected demand and other factors.

Bonds are another form of currency exchange – you will be getting your principal back 2, 5, 10, 20 or more years in the future, and receiving a fixed "rental" (the interest) every so often until then. Although the currency lent and repaid have the same name, they are really two different currencies because of the intervening time. For example you might buy the bond with 2008 US Dollars, receive an interest payment in 2010 US Dollars and finally be repaid the principal in 2018 US Dollars. Although bonds are said to have no "exchange risk", many of the other factors that drive currency futures prices also drive bond prices… especially interest rates and inflation expectations. No one will pay $1000 for a bond earning 3% if a new bond with the same maturity and risk profile can be purchased for $1000 that will pay 12%. And if one expects the money returned at maturity to be worth less than the money being used to buy the bond (due to inflation) then one will insist on a higher interest rate… or pay less up front than will be returned at maturity. If a new issue is priced too high (by setting its interest rate too low) there will be no buyers. So traders also set the price of bonds, which is another way to say that they set interest rates.

Of course, the expected future value of a currency can be higher as well as lower. When people expect their money to buy more in the future, they tend to put off purchases because they expect a better deal to come along later. This activity is called saving. The monetary effect is called deflation, because the amount of money chasing after the goods available is declining, making each unit of money more valuable as time goes by.

As I write this, the "Credit Crisis" and recession being experienced around the world is making the US Dollar more valuable. Banks, hedge funds, traders, investors, governments, home owners (in fact, nearly everyone) have borrowed large sums of money to leverage their investments and increase their rate of return. Although this practice is very profitable in good times, it quickly reverses its effect and multiplies the magnitude of losses when the value of the underlying assets declines. When losses get large enough, they can cause individuals and firms to go bankrupt, leading to still more losses for those who were doing business with them. In attempting to reduce this leverage, and thus reduce the rate of losses, firms and individuals are scrambling to get dollars to repay those loans. They sell whatever they can to raise the money. This selling of assets and buying of dollars pushes the value of the dollar higher with respect to almost everything – stocks, real estate, oil, gasoline, steel, copper, even gold.

In investing, it is common to borrow an asset, like a shares of a stock or a large amount of a commodity like copper or silver, and then sell it, anticipating that the price of the asset will fall, and it can be bought back cheaper in the future when it needs to be returned to the original owner. This is called "short selling". It is legal, and can be quite profitable. It improves functioning of markets by making available commodities that would otherwise site idle in warehouses, and enables more accurate pricing of stocks and commodities.

When a large number of traders have short positions in an asset, and the price of the asset goes up too much, those traders are looking at large losses, and some will decide to exit their positions by buying back the asset they had sold, paying a higher price, and taking the loss. This buying pushes the price even higher, causing more traders to decide to buy back the lent asset, and this can become a vicious circle, shooting the value up much higher than is warranted on fundamentals alone. This is called a "short squeeze". Eventually, the sellers who must get out have completed their buying, and the "gravity" of fundamental value reasserts itself. The asset price that spiked higher so rapidly now falls back, often just as fast or even faster than it rose during the squeeze.

If one thinks of money as a commodity, it makes sense that buying a stock (or a house) using leverage is a form of dollar short selling. Just like the silver trader who borrows silver and sells it for US Dollars is "short silver" (he is also "long the dollar" since he lots of that in his account) a house buyer with a mortgage has borrowed US Dollars and traded them for a house; she is "short the dollar" and "long real estate". The same can be said of stocks bought on margin – the trader is short the dollar and long stocks.

And just like any other commodity, the dollar is subject to short squeezes. When, let's say, stocks begin falling in value and many players in the market are short dollars and long stocks, they will be experiencing losses, and if those losses get large enough, they will need to "cover their short" by selling other assets to buy back the borrowed dollars. Note that this has nothing to do with the fundamentals of the dollar as a currency – how sound it is, how large the trade and current account deficits are, how fast the printing presses are running, nor does it matter how sound the assets they are selling are. The dollar short sellers need to get out NOW, and they will do whatever it takes to get out. It should also be clear that lending them more dollars is not an answer to their problem… they have already borrowed too much. They need to reduce, not increase, the size of their dollar short position.

And like all short squeezes, at some point the players who need to repay their dollars have done so, or have gone bankrupt trying. Now fundamentals reassert themselves, and the "overbought" dollar falls while the "oversold" stocks and commodities rise, each according to it's underlying value. Prices oscillate around for a while until balance is restored and the next cycle can begin.

Of course in the real world, there are many other processes going on at the same time. Uncertainty about true asset values, uncertainty about the soundness of trading partners, outright fraud, changes in production and demand, government and central bank policy changes and so on all play a role in determining the evolution of the overall economy.

How can we tell a dollar short squeeze during an inflationary period from a true deflation?

In both cases, the purchasing power of dollars is increasing, but the psychology is very different. In inflationary times, people look at a falling price and think, "Wow! I better scoop up that bargain now; it probably won't last long." In deflationary times they think, "No point in buying today, I'll wait until I really need it; it will probably be cheaper then."

I just experienced this at the local gas station. US gas prices in dollars have been falling since July, and are now about one half what they were then. In gold, they peaked in September, but have also fallen sharply. As I was driving by the station I saw a new lower price at the pump. My tank was half-full. In a deflationary mind-set, I would have reasoned that as I still had half a tank, I might as well wait for a few days to fill up, since the price would probably be lower than it is now, and by hanging on to the money I would be earning interest on it and gaining value. But that was not my reasoning… my reaction was to rush in and fill up quick at this great price while I still could. That is inflationary thinking.

True deflationary thinking takes time to develop. People have to experience falling prices for so long, that future low prices become their expectation. For almost 70 years prices have generally trended up as more and more money has been created.

Will the current "crisis" keep prices falling long enough to reverse that thinking?

It is hard to say for sure, but the fundamentals do not seem to be changing; if anything, they are deteriorating. Bailouts and stimulus programs are ballooning deficits and central banks are doing everything in their power to flood the system with liquidity. Let's look at what that means: the central banks (like the Federal Reserve) are selling dollars to the traders and banking houses who are desperate to reduce their dollar short positions. They are buying all sorts of assets, much of it the "financial toxic waste" that got the investment banks and hedge funds into this bad position in the first place. So now the Fed is shorting the dollar on a massive scale, taking the other side of the de-leveraging trade. But they have a huge advantage over other traders in the marketplace: they can never run out of dollars. No matter how big their losses get, they can always stay in the game. Or can they?

Where do they get the dollars they are supplying to the market? Most of them are borrowed from foreign governments that run trade surpluses, but ultimately, they will create them out of thin air if that's what it takes. And foreign governments and other large lenders will be increasingly nervous as they look at the central bank's balance sheet and see dwindling tax receipts and mostly junk bonds, non-performing mortgages, stock of failing or failed companies, and so on, as the primary source of future repayment. Of course they will get their money back eventually, but if the central bank just prints it up, its purchasing power in 5, 10 or 30 years will be only a small fraction of the value they are lending now. When they truly realize that, the game is over. When the central banks can no longer borrow, they will begin to print money in earnest. Then, it will be like the cartoon coyote running off the cliff: everything is going fine until he looks down and sees nothing but the canyon floor, far below him, and suddenly everything is not fine, gravity reasserts itself, and he is falling out of control, to eventually disappear in a puff of dust as he hits the ground. In economics, this is known as hyper-inflation. Think of Zimbabwe. Think of million-dollar bills, printed on one side only because it's too costly to print on both sides. Think of needing a wad of these to buy a single gallon of gas, or a gallon of milk, or a burger and fries.

But it will still take about the same amount of gold to buy a gallon of gas, or a meal, as it does today. Perhaps, if there is a massive flight to the safety of gold, gold's price may be pushed up compared to most other things, and it may take even less gold to buy a gallon of gas then it has historically, at least for a time, until things settle down again.

At the moment, it is quite profitable to speculate by buying and holding dollars and other fiat currencies. No one knows how high they will go, or how long it will take before they begin to fall again. But it is a speculation in a highly volatile commodity that has terrible fundamentals and is undergoing a powerful short squeeze. It is playing with fire, and it will take both luck and skill to make a profit and keep it.

Gold on the other hand is just a sound money. Holding it will not make you rich, but will keep you from getting poor. It will not build anything, employ anyone, or pay any interest. But it will retain its value. It is true cash that can be traded for enough local currency to buy what you need any place at any time.

If you have experienced large paper losses in your securities portfolio, be sure to evaluate those losses in terms of gold. Remember that the rising dollar may make your losses look bigger than they really are. Be sure to honor your stops: exit positions to preserve your capital, don't go on hoping they will recover. Look at each position and ask, "If I had the cash, would I buy this today, knowing everything I know about the security, the economy, and my own risk preferences?" If the answer is "yes", then keep the position; otherwise close it out, whether at a loss or a profit.

Take advantage of the dollar's rise to accumulate solid assets like gold (your cash position) and stock in the world's best companies, to buy debt-free real estate and to diversify yourself internationally. Invest in yourself. Learn a new skill or a new language. Travel. Improve your health. Exercise. Meditate. Start a business that can be profitable on a small scale without needing to take on debt, one that can exploit the market gaps that will be left as large old-line companies burdened with debt and union contracts go under. Or start an information publishing business to share what you've learned with others and help them weather the storm, prosper and become happier and healthier.

The bottom line is that health and happiness come first. Spend time with your family! Time is a tricky asset… as we grow older, we have less and less of it, and each second becomes more precious. Spend it wisely. Never confuse happiness with financial success. And never confuse your dollar net worth with your true wealth as measured in gold.